Creation

http://raghu-vraghava.blogspot.com/

One of the intriguing question probably yet unanswered is the fact that What,why,who...of creation,coupled with when and where only of creation.
Whole lot of metaphysics dwelves into the probabilities but yet nothing concrete except ruminating on perceptions....Religious thoughts have converged into oneness,but there are thoughts relating to nothingness(shoonyathvam)and manythingness(aneka vadham).
Thus these three concepts are metaphysically agreed possibilities.
If oneness is considered all energies in this universe emanate from the one supreme,call it the space,the holes init et al ...from where did this emanate,upanishads call it self-emanating...apourushaeya...anawdhi..ananth.Thus the question at the core remained unanswered except as a conjecture that a self-emanating substance could have created this world as it were,imagine a creation without a space that is limitless,impossible...which means either the one energy we ascribe for creation either created the space first or that the space was in existence for that energy to transform and manifest.thus there could be more than one substance that pre-existed creation.Could it be then ANeka vawda...probably then we are more closer to causa-causans but how could we visualise these energies and asign equal or more-than equal status between them probably then are into a struggle of identification post-creational energies.IF that be the case where both the above proposition are not realisable concepts then is shoonyavadh the right picture..and is shoonyavadh perceived as negation,probably shoonyavadh is not negation and contextually it only reflects the limits of human imagination and that core whether unified or multiply visible is not recognisable yet through human intelligence and has the potency to evade human intelligence.
RV